How we approach two complementary frontier areas — AI Personalization and InPlaceAI — with a shared commitment to individual context, seamless integration, and responsible augmentation of human capability.
Two complementary research directions that share a common methodology — but apply it to different frontiers of human–AI interaction.
AI that is deeply individualistic — tied to the individual’s style, preferences, and context. Moving beyond one-size-fits-all to truly personalized intelligence. Our research explores how models can adapt to the individual without losing general capability.
Creating AI that is right where we work every day — seamlessly integrated into your workflow, anticipating needs, and augmenting human capability without disruption. Our research explores ambient, context-aware AI that disappears into the tools people already use.
Both research pillars are guided by the same methodological commitments — even as they explore different frontiers.
Every design decision starts with the individual’s style, preferences, and working context.
AI should augment human capability without disruption — never substitute for human judgment.
Personalization and context-awareness must respect privacy — local-first where possible.
Continuous cycles of prototyping, user testing, and refinement across real workflows.
Explainable behavior, user control, and ethical review embedded from the start.
Success measured by real productivity, satisfaction, and reduced friction — not vanity metrics.
While the principles are shared, each pillar applies them to distinct research questions and technical challenges.
We treat personalization as a research problem in adaptive model behavior — how to bind intelligence to an individual’s style, preferences, and context without sacrificing generality or privacy.
We treat InPlaceAI as a research problem in ambient, context-aware integration — how AI can live inside existing workflows, anticipate needs, and augment human capability without adding friction.
Personalization and InPlaceAI are not silos — the most interesting questions sit where they intersect.
AI that understands both who you are and what you’re doing — adapting to your style while remaining ambient in your workflow.
Using individual and contextual signals to anticipate needs — while keeping the user in control of when and how AI intervenes.
Personalized adaptation that requires no extra effort from the user — integrated into the tools they already use, in the way they already work.
Handling both personal and workflow context with strong privacy boundaries — local-first where possible, transparent always.
Interested in partnering on AI Personalization or InPlaceAI research, or exploring how these directions could apply to your workflows? Let’s talk.